In this paper the idea that the legis actio per manus iniectionem could be applied for the case of the so called lex Aquilia de damno is disputed. There are no valid reasons to reject Göschen’s proposal to correct into ‘aliqua’ the word ‘aquilia’ which ends the line 15 in the fol. 96 uerso of the palimpsest of Gaius’ Institutes. On the contrary, a global evaluation of many aspects, both philological and juridical, leads to the conclusion that Göschen’s reading of Gai 4.21 has to be accepted.

Mario VARVARO (2016). Gai 4.21 e la presunta manus iniectio ex lege Aquilia. ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO, 333-347.

Gai 4.21 e la presunta manus iniectio ex lege Aquilia

VARVARO, Mario
2016-01-01

Abstract

In this paper the idea that the legis actio per manus iniectionem could be applied for the case of the so called lex Aquilia de damno is disputed. There are no valid reasons to reject Göschen’s proposal to correct into ‘aliqua’ the word ‘aquilia’ which ends the line 15 in the fol. 96 uerso of the palimpsest of Gaius’ Institutes. On the contrary, a global evaluation of many aspects, both philological and juridical, leads to the conclusion that Göschen’s reading of Gai 4.21 has to be accepted.
2016
Settore IUS/18 - Diritto Romano E Diritti Dell'Antichita'
Mario VARVARO (2016). Gai 4.21 e la presunta manus iniectio ex lege Aquilia. ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO, 333-347.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VARVARO Gai 4.21 e la presunta manus iniectio ex lege Aquilia (AUPA 59, 2016, 333-347).pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 363.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
363.39 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/218763
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact