In this paper the idea that the legis actio per manus iniectionem could be applied for the case of the so called lex Aquilia de damno is disputed. There are no valid reasons to reject Göschen’s proposal to correct into ‘aliqua’ the word ‘aquilia’ which ends the line 15 in the fol. 96 uerso of the palimpsest of Gaius’ Institutes. On the contrary, a global evaluation of many aspects, both philological and juridical, leads to the conclusion that Göschen’s reading of Gai 4.21 has to be accepted.
Mario VARVARO (2016). Gai 4.21 e la presunta manus iniectio ex lege Aquilia. ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO, 333-347.
Gai 4.21 e la presunta manus iniectio ex lege Aquilia
VARVARO, Mario
2016-01-01
Abstract
In this paper the idea that the legis actio per manus iniectionem could be applied for the case of the so called lex Aquilia de damno is disputed. There are no valid reasons to reject Göschen’s proposal to correct into ‘aliqua’ the word ‘aquilia’ which ends the line 15 in the fol. 96 uerso of the palimpsest of Gaius’ Institutes. On the contrary, a global evaluation of many aspects, both philological and juridical, leads to the conclusion that Göschen’s reading of Gai 4.21 has to be accepted.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VARVARO Gai 4.21 e la presunta manus iniectio ex lege Aquilia (AUPA 59, 2016, 333-347).pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Dimensione
363.39 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
363.39 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
