There was recently an attempt to correlate some sectors of the studies on argumentation and the theory of democracy. The relationship between these two areas concerns the fact that in both cases there is a significant interest in normative models of good argumentation. In these models there is no place for rhetoric. Our work has a twofold aim: (1) to show that, starting from the Aristotelian rhetoric, it is possible to develop a more suitable model of argumentation in the public sphere and (2) to doubt the very need to identify normative constraints for this type of argument.
Di Piazza, S., Piazza, F., Serra, M. (2016). Does Public Deliberation really Need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory. In D. Mohammed, M. Lewinski (a cura di), Argumentation and Reasoned Action. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, Volume I. London : College publications.
Does Public Deliberation really Need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory
DI PIAZZA, Salvatore;PIAZZA, Francesca;
2016-01-01
Abstract
There was recently an attempt to correlate some sectors of the studies on argumentation and the theory of democracy. The relationship between these two areas concerns the fact that in both cases there is a significant interest in normative models of good argumentation. In these models there is no place for rhetoric. Our work has a twofold aim: (1) to show that, starting from the Aristotelian rhetoric, it is possible to develop a more suitable model of argumentation in the public sphere and (2) to doubt the very need to identify normative constraints for this type of argument.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lisbona definitivo pubblicato.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Dimensione
456.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
456.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
