We introduce and study a complexity function on words cx(n), called cyclic complexity, which counts the number of conjugacy classes of factors of length n of an infinite word x. We extend the well-known Morse–Hedlund theorem to the setting of cyclic complexity by showing that a word is ultimately periodic if and only if it has bounded cyclic complexity. Unlike most complexity functions, cyclic complexity distinguishes between Sturmian words of different slopes. We prove that if x is a Sturmian word and y is a word having the same cyclic complexity of x, then up to renaming letters, x and y have the same set of factors. In particular, y is also Sturmian of slope equal to that of x. Since cx(n)=1 for some n≥1 implies x is periodic, it is natural to consider the quantity liminfn→∞cx(n). We show that if x is a Sturmian word, then liminfn→∞cx(n)=2. We prove however that this is not a characterization of Sturmian words by exhibiting a restricted class of Toeplitz words, including the period-doubling word, which also verify this same condition on the limit infimum. In contrast we show that, for the Thue–Morse word t, liminfn→∞ct(n)=+∞.
Cassaigne, J., Fici, G., Sciortino, M., Zamboni, L. (2017). Cyclic complexity of words. JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY. SERIES A, 145, 36-56 [10.1016/j.jcta.2016.07.002].
Cyclic complexity of words
FICI, Gabriele;SCIORTINO, Marinella;
2017-01-01
Abstract
We introduce and study a complexity function on words cx(n), called cyclic complexity, which counts the number of conjugacy classes of factors of length n of an infinite word x. We extend the well-known Morse–Hedlund theorem to the setting of cyclic complexity by showing that a word is ultimately periodic if and only if it has bounded cyclic complexity. Unlike most complexity functions, cyclic complexity distinguishes between Sturmian words of different slopes. We prove that if x is a Sturmian word and y is a word having the same cyclic complexity of x, then up to renaming letters, x and y have the same set of factors. In particular, y is also Sturmian of slope equal to that of x. Since cx(n)=1 for some n≥1 implies x is periodic, it is natural to consider the quantity liminfn→∞cx(n). We show that if x is a Sturmian word, then liminfn→∞cx(n)=2. We prove however that this is not a characterization of Sturmian words by exhibiting a restricted class of Toeplitz words, including the period-doubling word, which also verify this same condition on the limit infimum. In contrast we show that, for the Thue–Morse word t, liminfn→∞ct(n)=+∞.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
270fb6013ae5cf296050c9738673a00f.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
6.99 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.99 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.