Background Safety of non-operative management for low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) is debated. Aim To perform a systematic review/meta-analysis to determine their risk of developing pancreatic malignancy and of pancreatic malignancy-related deaths. Methods A MEDLINE search was performed and methodology was based on PRISMA statement. Incidence rates of overall pancreatic malignancy, malignant BD-IPMN, IPMN-distinct PDAC, and of pancreatic malignancy-related death rates were calculated by dividing the total number of events by the total number of person-years (pyrs) of follow-up. Heterogeneity was determined by I2 statistic. Results 20 studies including 2177 patients were included. Mean follow-up ranged from 29.3 to 76.7 months. Overall, 82 patients (3.7%) developed a pancreatic malignancy with a pooled estimate rate of 0.007/pyrs (I2 = 32.8%). The pooled estimate rate of malignant IPMN was 0.004/pyrs (I2 = 40.8%), and the pooled estimate rate of distinct PDAC 0.002/pyrs (I2 = 0%). The rate of death due to pancreatic malignancy during follow-up was 0.9%, with an overall pooled estimate rate of death of 0.002/pyrs (I2 = 0%). Conclusion Non-operative management of low-risk BD-IPMN is safe, with a very low risk of malignant transformation of IPMN and of distinct PDAC. The rate of pancreatic malignancy-related mortality is low, particularly when compared with the mortality of pancreatic surgery.

Crippa, S., Capurso, G., Cammà, C., Delle Fave, G., Castillo, C., Falconi, M. (2016). Risk of pancreatic malignancy and mortality in branch-duct IPMNs undergoing surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 48(5), 473-479 [10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.003].

Risk of pancreatic malignancy and mortality in branch-duct IPMNs undergoing surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

CAMMA', Calogero;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Background Safety of non-operative management for low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) is debated. Aim To perform a systematic review/meta-analysis to determine their risk of developing pancreatic malignancy and of pancreatic malignancy-related deaths. Methods A MEDLINE search was performed and methodology was based on PRISMA statement. Incidence rates of overall pancreatic malignancy, malignant BD-IPMN, IPMN-distinct PDAC, and of pancreatic malignancy-related death rates were calculated by dividing the total number of events by the total number of person-years (pyrs) of follow-up. Heterogeneity was determined by I2 statistic. Results 20 studies including 2177 patients were included. Mean follow-up ranged from 29.3 to 76.7 months. Overall, 82 patients (3.7%) developed a pancreatic malignancy with a pooled estimate rate of 0.007/pyrs (I2 = 32.8%). The pooled estimate rate of malignant IPMN was 0.004/pyrs (I2 = 40.8%), and the pooled estimate rate of distinct PDAC 0.002/pyrs (I2 = 0%). The rate of death due to pancreatic malignancy during follow-up was 0.9%, with an overall pooled estimate rate of death of 0.002/pyrs (I2 = 0%). Conclusion Non-operative management of low-risk BD-IPMN is safe, with a very low risk of malignant transformation of IPMN and of distinct PDAC. The rate of pancreatic malignancy-related mortality is low, particularly when compared with the mortality of pancreatic surgery.
2016
Crippa, S., Capurso, G., Cammà, C., Delle Fave, G., Castillo, C., Falconi, M. (2016). Risk of pancreatic malignancy and mortality in branch-duct IPMNs undergoing surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 48(5), 473-479 [10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.003].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Risk of pancreatic malignancy and mortality in branch-duct .pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 785.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
785.51 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/191050
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 71
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 69
social impact