Background: In outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), blood eosinophilia is considered as a biomarker of response to systemic corticosteroid therapy. However, little is known on whether blood eosinophilia is also predictive of positive clinical outcome in severe acute exacerbations of COPD requiring hospitalization. We hypothesized that blood eosinophil-positive severe acute exacerbations of COPD differ from eosinophil-negative ones in terms of response to therapy and clinical outcomes. Methods: To test our experimental hypothesis, we retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with COPD admitted to our ward because of severe exacerbation, over a two-year period of observation. After evaluation of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 132 patients were selected and divided in cases (blood eosinophilia ≥2% at admission; n = 20) and controls (blood eosinophilia <2% at admission; n = 112). Results: Cases had a shorter hospital stay than controls (geometric mean = 8.9 ± 1.5 versus 11.3 ± 1.5 days; p = 0.028). In addition, cases had a significantly lower consumption of systemic corticosteroids (geometric mean = 19.2 ± 4.0 versus 35.7 ± 2.5 mg per day of hospitalization; p = 0.012). Conclusions: In severe acute exacerbations of COPD requiring hospitalization, blood eosinophilia identifies a subgroup of subjects characterized by a prompt response to treatment with shorter hospital stay.

Serafino-Agrusa, L., Scichilone, N., Spatafora, M., Battaglia, S. (2016). Blood eosinophils and treatment response in hospitalized exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A case-control study. PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 37, 89-94 [10.1016/j.pupt.2016.03.004].

Blood eosinophils and treatment response in hospitalized exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A case-control study

SERAFINO AGRUSA, Laura;SCICHILONE, Nicola Alessandro;SPATAFORA, Mario;BATTAGLIA, Salvatore
2016-01-01

Abstract

Background: In outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), blood eosinophilia is considered as a biomarker of response to systemic corticosteroid therapy. However, little is known on whether blood eosinophilia is also predictive of positive clinical outcome in severe acute exacerbations of COPD requiring hospitalization. We hypothesized that blood eosinophil-positive severe acute exacerbations of COPD differ from eosinophil-negative ones in terms of response to therapy and clinical outcomes. Methods: To test our experimental hypothesis, we retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with COPD admitted to our ward because of severe exacerbation, over a two-year period of observation. After evaluation of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 132 patients were selected and divided in cases (blood eosinophilia ≥2% at admission; n = 20) and controls (blood eosinophilia <2% at admission; n = 112). Results: Cases had a shorter hospital stay than controls (geometric mean = 8.9 ± 1.5 versus 11.3 ± 1.5 days; p = 0.028). In addition, cases had a significantly lower consumption of systemic corticosteroids (geometric mean = 19.2 ± 4.0 versus 35.7 ± 2.5 mg per day of hospitalization; p = 0.012). Conclusions: In severe acute exacerbations of COPD requiring hospitalization, blood eosinophilia identifies a subgroup of subjects characterized by a prompt response to treatment with shorter hospital stay.
2016
Serafino-Agrusa, L., Scichilone, N., Spatafora, M., Battaglia, S. (2016). Blood eosinophils and treatment response in hospitalized exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A case-control study. PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 37, 89-94 [10.1016/j.pupt.2016.03.004].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Serafino-Agrusa - 2016 PPT.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 414.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
414.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/189568
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 29
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact