Tracheostomy is performed in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation aiming at avoiding the potential detrimental effect of a sustained translaryngeal intubation (e.g. laryngeal oedema, mucosal ulcerations). Potential benefits of tracheostomy in critically ill patients are improved comfort and reduced need for sedation, easier clearance of secretions and oral hygiene, and a possible faster weaning from mechanical ventilation. Controversy exists over optimal timing (early, tracheostomy placement compared with later time points) in patients with respiratory failure. Among the published randomised controlled trials, two large studies did not report a significant advantage of an early tracheostomy compared to a late procedure for the primary outcomes of incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and all-cause of mortality at 30 days from randomisation. In non-head injured blunt trauma patients with prolonged respiratory failure, tracheostomy placement after 7–10 days seems appropriate. This timing would avoid the potential procedural complications of an unnecessary procedure in patients with a possible shorter period of mechanical ventilation. Further investigations are needed for giving proper indication and timing of tracheostomy in selected populations (e.g. traumatic and non-traumatic neurologic injuries).

Cortegiani, A., Russotto, V., Gregoretti, C. (2016). Indication and Timing. In Percutaneous tracheostomy in Critically ill patients (pp. 17-28). Giuseppe Servillo, Paolo Pelosi [10.1007/978-3-319-22300-1_3].

Indication and Timing

CORTEGIANI, Andrea;RUSSOTTO, Vincenzo;Gregoretti, Cesare
2016-01-01

Abstract

Tracheostomy is performed in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation aiming at avoiding the potential detrimental effect of a sustained translaryngeal intubation (e.g. laryngeal oedema, mucosal ulcerations). Potential benefits of tracheostomy in critically ill patients are improved comfort and reduced need for sedation, easier clearance of secretions and oral hygiene, and a possible faster weaning from mechanical ventilation. Controversy exists over optimal timing (early, tracheostomy placement compared with later time points) in patients with respiratory failure. Among the published randomised controlled trials, two large studies did not report a significant advantage of an early tracheostomy compared to a late procedure for the primary outcomes of incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and all-cause of mortality at 30 days from randomisation. In non-head injured blunt trauma patients with prolonged respiratory failure, tracheostomy placement after 7–10 days seems appropriate. This timing would avoid the potential procedural complications of an unnecessary procedure in patients with a possible shorter period of mechanical ventilation. Further investigations are needed for giving proper indication and timing of tracheostomy in selected populations (e.g. traumatic and non-traumatic neurologic injuries).
2016
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
Cortegiani, A., Russotto, V., Gregoretti, C. (2016). Indication and Timing. In Percutaneous tracheostomy in Critically ill patients (pp. 17-28). Giuseppe Servillo, Paolo Pelosi [10.1007/978-3-319-22300-1_3].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients Servillo Pelosi Springer Verlag 2015 PROOFS FINAL.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Libro in versione Editors Proof
Dimensione 4.61 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.61 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/159916
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact