Evaluating the economic damage caused by soil erosion is important. In addition to increasing the awareness of the problem among farmers and policy makers, evaluation of the economic damage caused by erosion can promote the implementation of more sustainable soil management practices. In the present study, we describe a new approach to evaluate incentives for the adoption of agri-environment measure (AEM) in degraded and eroded vineyards. To estimate this incentive, the replacement cost (RC) and the loss of income are calculated when the vineyard is managed with conventional tillage versus a cover crop (AEM). Our findings show that the incentive could range from the loss of income due to AEM adoption to the ecosystem service benefit (RCC-RCAEM). In our case study, the incentive ranged from 315Euroha(-1) (loss of income) to 1,088Euroha(-1) (ecosystem service benefit). Within this range, the incentive amount is determined according to efficiency criteria based on vineyard slope. We also present a conceptual model of public spending efficiency that should help policy makers decide how to allocate the incentives so as to maximize the economic return associated with ecosystem services.

Galati, A., Gristina, L., Crescimanno, M., Barone, E., Novara, A. (2015). Towards More Efficient Incentives for Agri-environment Measures in Degraded and Eroded Vineyards. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 26(6), 557-564 [10.1002/ldr.2389].

Towards More Efficient Incentives for Agri-environment Measures in Degraded and Eroded Vineyards

GALATI, Antonino;GRISTINA, Luciano;CRESCIMANNO, Maria;BARONE, Ettore;NOVARA, Agata
2015-01-01

Abstract

Evaluating the economic damage caused by soil erosion is important. In addition to increasing the awareness of the problem among farmers and policy makers, evaluation of the economic damage caused by erosion can promote the implementation of more sustainable soil management practices. In the present study, we describe a new approach to evaluate incentives for the adoption of agri-environment measure (AEM) in degraded and eroded vineyards. To estimate this incentive, the replacement cost (RC) and the loss of income are calculated when the vineyard is managed with conventional tillage versus a cover crop (AEM). Our findings show that the incentive could range from the loss of income due to AEM adoption to the ecosystem service benefit (RCC-RCAEM). In our case study, the incentive ranged from 315Euroha(-1) (loss of income) to 1,088Euroha(-1) (ecosystem service benefit). Within this range, the incentive amount is determined according to efficiency criteria based on vineyard slope. We also present a conceptual model of public spending efficiency that should help policy makers decide how to allocate the incentives so as to maximize the economic return associated with ecosystem services.
2015
Settore AGR/01 - Economia Ed Estimo Rurale
Settore AGR/02 - Agronomia E Coltivazioni Erbacee
Settore AGR/03 - Arboricoltura Generale E Coltivazioni Arboree
Galati, A., Gristina, L., Crescimanno, M., Barone, E., Novara, A. (2015). Towards More Efficient Incentives for Agri-environment Measures in Degraded and Eroded Vineyards. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 26(6), 557-564 [10.1002/ldr.2389].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pubblicazione No 5.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 661.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
661.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/157658
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 62
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 59
social impact