Scientists are actively debating whether the Anthropocene, the geologic time span (GTS) we are now living in, should be considered a period, epoch, or age in the geologic timescale. The solution is not easy, because the beginning of this GTS is undefined and the end unknown. In fact, there is no agreement on when the Anthropocene began, the proposed dates ranging from the Second World War, when radioactive fallout branded soils and sediments all over the world, to little after the end of the last glacial period, i.e. 11.7 thousand years ago, therefore coinciding with the onset of the Holocene. We are in favour of a concurrence of the Anthropocene with the Holocene, although a major impact of people on the environment began diachronically in different parts of the world. This single GTS should be named Anthropocene because it is chiefly characterized by a peculiar process of change for the planet: human impact. Nevertheless, a pivotal hindrance for the Anthropocene to be worthy of a formal geologic definition remains. The Anthropocene is open ended, therefore its real duration is unknown.

Certini, G., Scalenghe, R. (2014). Is the Anthropocene really worthy of a formal geologic definition?. THE ANTHROPOCENE REVIEW, 2(1), 77-80 [10.1177/2053019614563840].

Is the Anthropocene really worthy of a formal geologic definition?

SCALENGHE, Riccardo
2014-01-01

Abstract

Scientists are actively debating whether the Anthropocene, the geologic time span (GTS) we are now living in, should be considered a period, epoch, or age in the geologic timescale. The solution is not easy, because the beginning of this GTS is undefined and the end unknown. In fact, there is no agreement on when the Anthropocene began, the proposed dates ranging from the Second World War, when radioactive fallout branded soils and sediments all over the world, to little after the end of the last glacial period, i.e. 11.7 thousand years ago, therefore coinciding with the onset of the Holocene. We are in favour of a concurrence of the Anthropocene with the Holocene, although a major impact of people on the environment began diachronically in different parts of the world. This single GTS should be named Anthropocene because it is chiefly characterized by a peculiar process of change for the planet: human impact. Nevertheless, a pivotal hindrance for the Anthropocene to be worthy of a formal geologic definition remains. The Anthropocene is open ended, therefore its real duration is unknown.
2014
Certini, G., Scalenghe, R. (2014). Is the Anthropocene really worthy of a formal geologic definition?. THE ANTHROPOCENE REVIEW, 2(1), 77-80 [10.1177/2053019614563840].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Certini&ScalengheANR2014.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: manuscript
Dimensione 642.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
642.89 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/123216
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact