Analyses regarding clauses with a cognate object (CO), e.g. Alice laughed a scornful laugh, have frequently been based on the query: is the CO an adjunct or a complement? This paper aims to contribute to the debate with an alternative suggestion: the CO functions as a noun predicate licensing the subject, to which it assigns a semantic role, whilst the verb functions as a support (a ‘light verb’). A number of the well-known properties of COs, e.g. certain constraints on the determiner, appear to corroborate this analysis. Clauses with the so-called reaction object (RO), e.g. Alice coughed a scornful laugh, are analyzed as multi-predicative as well: also the RO is a noun predicate which licenses the subject and assigns it a semantic role. Nevertheless, the verbs behave differently: whereas in the case of COs it is irrelevant whether the verb licenses the subject and assigns it a semantic role, inasmuch as such a role would be identical to that assigned by the CO, in the RO construction the verb does re-license the subject and assigns it an additional semantic role.

MIRTO, I.M. (2011). Oggetti interni e reaction objects come nomi predicativi di costrutti a verbo supporto. ÉCHO DES ÉTUDES ROMANES, VII, 1, 21-47.

Oggetti interni e reaction objects come nomi predicativi di costrutti a verbo supporto

MIRTO, Ignazio Mauro
2011-01-01

Abstract

Analyses regarding clauses with a cognate object (CO), e.g. Alice laughed a scornful laugh, have frequently been based on the query: is the CO an adjunct or a complement? This paper aims to contribute to the debate with an alternative suggestion: the CO functions as a noun predicate licensing the subject, to which it assigns a semantic role, whilst the verb functions as a support (a ‘light verb’). A number of the well-known properties of COs, e.g. certain constraints on the determiner, appear to corroborate this analysis. Clauses with the so-called reaction object (RO), e.g. Alice coughed a scornful laugh, are analyzed as multi-predicative as well: also the RO is a noun predicate which licenses the subject and assigns it a semantic role. Nevertheless, the verbs behave differently: whereas in the case of COs it is irrelevant whether the verb licenses the subject and assigns it a semantic role, inasmuch as such a role would be identical to that assigned by the CO, in the RO construction the verb does re-license the subject and assigns it an additional semantic role.
2011
Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia E Linguistica
MIRTO, I.M. (2011). Oggetti interni e reaction objects come nomi predicativi di costrutti a verbo supporto. ÉCHO DES ÉTUDES ROMANES, VII, 1, 21-47.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2011-1-02-Mirto.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.1 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Echo-2011-1-p1-4.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: frontespizio e indice
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 23.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
23.2 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/103679
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact