1. Ecologists often group organisms based on similar biological traits or on taxonomic criteria. However, the use of taxonomy in ecology has many drawbacks because taxa may include species with very different ecological adaptations. Further, similar characters may evolve independently in different lineages. 2. In this review, we examine the main criteria that have been used in the identification of nine modes of classifying phytoplankton non-taxonomically. These approaches are based purely on morphological and/or structural traits, or on more complex combinations including physiological and ecological features. 3. Different functional approaches have proved able to explain some fraction of the variance observed in the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of algal assemblages, although their effectiveness varies greatly, depending on the number and characteristics of functional traits used. The attribution of functional traits to single species or broad groups of species has allowed a few classifications (e.g. Functional Groups, FG) to be used in the assessment of ecological status. 4. We stress that the misuse of functional classifications (by applying them under conditions other than those intended) can have serious consequences for interpreting ecological processes. Assigning functional traits or groups cannot be considered a surrogate for the knowledge of species or ecotypes, and the use of specific traits must always be justified and circumscribed within the limits of ecological questions and hypotheses. 5. An important future challenge will be to integrate advances in molecular genetics, metabolomics and physiology with more conventional traits; this will form the basis of the next generation of functional classifications.

Salmaso, N., NASELLI FLORES, L., Padisak, J. (2015). Functional classifications and their application in phytoplankton ecology. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 60(4), 603-619 [10.1111/fwb.12520].

Functional classifications and their application in phytoplankton ecology

NASELLI FLORES, Luigi;
2015-04-01

Abstract

1. Ecologists often group organisms based on similar biological traits or on taxonomic criteria. However, the use of taxonomy in ecology has many drawbacks because taxa may include species with very different ecological adaptations. Further, similar characters may evolve independently in different lineages. 2. In this review, we examine the main criteria that have been used in the identification of nine modes of classifying phytoplankton non-taxonomically. These approaches are based purely on morphological and/or structural traits, or on more complex combinations including physiological and ecological features. 3. Different functional approaches have proved able to explain some fraction of the variance observed in the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of algal assemblages, although their effectiveness varies greatly, depending on the number and characteristics of functional traits used. The attribution of functional traits to single species or broad groups of species has allowed a few classifications (e.g. Functional Groups, FG) to be used in the assessment of ecological status. 4. We stress that the misuse of functional classifications (by applying them under conditions other than those intended) can have serious consequences for interpreting ecological processes. Assigning functional traits or groups cannot be considered a surrogate for the knowledge of species or ecotypes, and the use of specific traits must always be justified and circumscribed within the limits of ecological questions and hypotheses. 5. An important future challenge will be to integrate advances in molecular genetics, metabolomics and physiology with more conventional traits; this will form the basis of the next generation of functional classifications.
Settore BIO/03 - Botanica Ambientale E Applicata
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fwb.12520
Salmaso, N., NASELLI FLORES, L., Padisak, J. (2015). Functional classifications and their application in phytoplankton ecology. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 60(4), 603-619 [10.1111/fwb.12520].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
fwb12520-sup-0001-TableS1.docx

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Appendix 1
Tipologia: Altro materiale (es. dati della ricerca)
Dimensione 28.55 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
28.55 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
fwb12520-sup-0002-TableS2.docx

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Appendix 2
Tipologia: Altro materiale (es. dati della ricerca)
Dimensione 24.26 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
24.26 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2015_FWB_Functional classification2.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 452.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
452.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/103108
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 162
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 147
social impact