Several different approaches to Situational Method Engineering exist. They differ in terms of the primary element of the paradigm: the method fragment definition. Here, we introduce four method fragment definitions from the literature and compare their metamodels according to structural and functional criteria. The structural comparison showed a general alignment of some concepts that are sometimes referred with different names while the study of the compositional aspects results in evidence of substantial differences.
COSSENTINO M, GAGLIO S, HENDERSON-SELLERS B, SEIDITA V (2006). A metamodelling-based approach for method fragment comparison. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (pp.57-70).
A metamodelling-based approach for method fragment comparison
GAGLIO, Salvatore;SEIDITA, Valeria
2006-01-01
Abstract
Several different approaches to Situational Method Engineering exist. They differ in terms of the primary element of the paradigm: the method fragment definition. Here, we introduce four method fragment definitions from the literature and compare their metamodels according to structural and functional criteria. The structural comparison showed a general alignment of some concepts that are sometimes referred with different names while the study of the compositional aspects results in evidence of substantial differences.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
bbb0501a6c6f7d3dda9f62180d72f8f3ba5f.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Descrizione: pdf
Dimensione
87.36 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
87.36 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.