The static approach to evaluate the limit multiplier directly was rephrased using the Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method (SGBEM) for multidomain type problems [1,2]. The present formulation couples SGBEM multidomain procedure with nonlinear optimization techniques, making use of the self-equilibrium stress equation [3-5]. This equation connects the stresses at the Gauss points of each substructure (bem-e) to plastic strains through a self-stress matrix computed in all the bem-elements of the discretized system. The analysis was performed by means of a conic quadratic optimization problem, in terms of discrete variables, and implemented using Karnak.sGbem code [6] coupled with MathLab. Finally, some numerical tests are shown and the limit multiplier values are compared with those available in the literature [4,8]. The applications show a very important computational advantage of this strategy which allows one to introduce a domain discretization only in the zones involved in plastic strain action and to leave the rest of the structure as elastic macroelements, therefore governed by few boundary variables.
Panzeca, T.; Cucco, F.; Parlavecchio, E.; Zito, L. (10-12 Luglio 2011).A combined approach of SGBEM and conic quadratic optimization for limit analysis.
A combined approach of SGBEM and conic quadratic optimization for limit analysis
PANZECA, Teotista;PARLAVECCHIO, Eugenia;ZITO, Liborio
Abstract
The static approach to evaluate the limit multiplier directly was rephrased using the Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method (SGBEM) for multidomain type problems [1,2]. The present formulation couples SGBEM multidomain procedure with nonlinear optimization techniques, making use of the self-equilibrium stress equation [3-5]. This equation connects the stresses at the Gauss points of each substructure (bem-e) to plastic strains through a self-stress matrix computed in all the bem-elements of the discretized system. The analysis was performed by means of a conic quadratic optimization problem, in terms of discrete variables, and implemented using Karnak.sGbem code [6] coupled with MathLab. Finally, some numerical tests are shown and the limit multiplier values are compared with those available in the literature [4,8]. The applications show a very important computational advantage of this strategy which allows one to introduce a domain discretization only in the zones involved in plastic strain action and to leave the rest of the structure as elastic macroelements, therefore governed by few boundary variables.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BETEQ 2011.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
188.21 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
188.21 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


