Numerous statistical methodologies regarding the study of discrimination are based on the well-known Blinder-Oaxaca (1973) decomposition. This divides the wage differential between men and women into one part, which can be explained by differences in individual characteristics, and another part, which is interpreted as discrimination. This decomposition ignores any distributional issues in evaluating discrimination, thus permitting, undesirably, compensation between positively and negatively discriminated women. Jenkins (1994) has criticized this aspect, instead preferring a distributional approach. Del Ri­o et al. (2010), using a distributional approach, which hinges on the deprivational aspect of discrimination, adapts the Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (1984) class of poverty indices to the study of discrimination. Studies adopting the distributional approach pay little attention to the issue of the separate measuring of wage discrimination and occupational discrimination. Instead, our Paper uses the Foster-Greer-Thorbecke indices for measuring wage discrimination and occupational discrimination separately. Similar to the technique employed in the Brown-Moon-Zoloth decomposition (1980), we have thus used a multinomial model to estimate the theoretical distribution of women in occupation, in the absence of occupational discrimination.

Giaimo, R., Lo Magno, G.L. (2011). A distributional approach for measuring wage discrimination and occupational discrimination separately. In Quaderni di Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche "Paolo Fortunati".

A distributional approach for measuring wage discrimination and occupational discrimination separately

GIAIMO, Rosa;LO MAGNO, Giovanni Luca
2011-01-01

Abstract

Numerous statistical methodologies regarding the study of discrimination are based on the well-known Blinder-Oaxaca (1973) decomposition. This divides the wage differential between men and women into one part, which can be explained by differences in individual characteristics, and another part, which is interpreted as discrimination. This decomposition ignores any distributional issues in evaluating discrimination, thus permitting, undesirably, compensation between positively and negatively discriminated women. Jenkins (1994) has criticized this aspect, instead preferring a distributional approach. Del Ri­o et al. (2010), using a distributional approach, which hinges on the deprivational aspect of discrimination, adapts the Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (1984) class of poverty indices to the study of discrimination. Studies adopting the distributional approach pay little attention to the issue of the separate measuring of wage discrimination and occupational discrimination. Instead, our Paper uses the Foster-Greer-Thorbecke indices for measuring wage discrimination and occupational discrimination separately. Similar to the technique employed in the Brown-Moon-Zoloth decomposition (1980), we have thus used a multinomial model to estimate the theoretical distribution of women in occupation, in the absence of occupational discrimination.
SIS 2011 Statistical Conference - Statistics in the 150 years from Italian Unification - June 8, 2011- June 10, 2011
Bologna
8-10 Giugno 2011
2011
1
Giaimo, R., Lo Magno, G.L. (2011). A distributional approach for measuring wage discrimination and occupational discrimination separately. In Quaderni di Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche "Paolo Fortunati".
Proceedings (atti dei congressi)
Giaimo, R; Lo Magno, GL
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Quaderni di Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche Paolo Fortunati - Serie Ricerche 2011 - No. 2 - Book of Abstracts.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Book of abstracts
Dimensione 734.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
734.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/105549
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact