Tension-free muscle closure is essential in kidney transplantation, both in adult and pediatric patients. Tight muscle closure may lead to renal allograft compartment syndrome either due to compression of the renal parenchyma or due to kinking of the renal vessels. It may also cause kinking of the transplant kidney ureter, wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. Many techniques have been proposed in an attempt to achieve tension-free closure. There is a wrong belief among surgeons that using prosthetic mesh may increase the incidence of infective complications in these immunosuppressed patients. Also, there is fear that one is not able to monitor the renal graft by ultrasound and perform biopsy in the presence of a mesh. Other alternative techniques to mesh closure include subcutaneous placement and intraperitonealization of the kidney transplant. These techniques however, are valuable when mesh closure is unfavorable or contraindicated as in case of a potential source of infection, like a stoma. Abdominal wall fasciotomy can be adjunctive to the various techniques of muscle closure.

Palumbo, V.D., Damiano, G., Gioviale, M.C., Lo Monte, A.I. (2014). Mesh or no mesh: a hamletic dilemma to prevent Renal Allograft Compartment Syndrome (RACS). ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 85(3), 282-286.

Mesh or no mesh: a hamletic dilemma to prevent Renal Allograft Compartment Syndrome (RACS)

PALUMBO, Vincenzo Davide;DAMIANO, Giuseppe;GIOVIALE, Maria Concetta;LO MONTE, Attilio Ignazio
2014-01-01

Abstract

Tension-free muscle closure is essential in kidney transplantation, both in adult and pediatric patients. Tight muscle closure may lead to renal allograft compartment syndrome either due to compression of the renal parenchyma or due to kinking of the renal vessels. It may also cause kinking of the transplant kidney ureter, wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. Many techniques have been proposed in an attempt to achieve tension-free closure. There is a wrong belief among surgeons that using prosthetic mesh may increase the incidence of infective complications in these immunosuppressed patients. Also, there is fear that one is not able to monitor the renal graft by ultrasound and perform biopsy in the presence of a mesh. Other alternative techniques to mesh closure include subcutaneous placement and intraperitonealization of the kidney transplant. These techniques however, are valuable when mesh closure is unfavorable or contraindicated as in case of a potential source of infection, like a stoma. Abdominal wall fasciotomy can be adjunctive to the various techniques of muscle closure.
2014
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
Palumbo, V.D., Damiano, G., Gioviale, M.C., Lo Monte, A.I. (2014). Mesh or no mesh: a hamletic dilemma to prevent Renal Allograft Compartment Syndrome (RACS). ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 85(3), 282-286.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mesh or no mesh.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Dimensione 505.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
505.88 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/96426
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact