The purpose of this essay is to reframe the conceptual division between rights and remedies by identifying those issues that are generally raised in the legal discourse when dealing with the two perspectives. The focus will be particularly on: policies that govern rights and remedies, judicial discretion, and judicial interpretation. While the traditional account based on a sharp opposition of rights and remedies proved to be untrustworthy, the proposed conceptualization helps to outline the distinction in a more realistic way.

smorto, g. (2014). Sul significato di "rimedi". EUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO, 1(1), 159-200.

Sul significato di "rimedi"

SMORTO, Guido
2014-01-01

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to reframe the conceptual division between rights and remedies by identifying those issues that are generally raised in the legal discourse when dealing with the two perspectives. The focus will be particularly on: policies that govern rights and remedies, judicial discretion, and judicial interpretation. While the traditional account based on a sharp opposition of rights and remedies proved to be untrustworthy, the proposed conceptualization helps to outline the distinction in a more realistic way.
2014
Settore IUS/02 - Diritto Privato Comparato
Settore IUS/01 - Diritto Privato
smorto, g. (2014). Sul significato di "rimedi". EUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO, 1(1), 159-200.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014 rimedi.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 149.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
149.64 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/95563
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact