Pickering & Garrod (P&G) explain dialogue dynamics in terms of forward modeling and prediction-by-simulation mechanisms. Their theory dissolves a strict segregation between production and comprehension processes, and it links dialogue to action-based theories of joint action. We propose that the theory can also incorporate intentional strategies that increase communicative success: for example, signaling strategies that help remaining predictable and forming common ground.

Pezzulo, G., Dindo, H. (2013). Intentional strategies that make co-actors more predictable: The case of signaling. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 36 [10.1017/S0140525X12002816].

Intentional strategies that make co-actors more predictable: The case of signaling

DINDO, Haris
2013-01-01

Abstract

Pickering & Garrod (P&G) explain dialogue dynamics in terms of forward modeling and prediction-by-simulation mechanisms. Their theory dissolves a strict segregation between production and comprehension processes, and it links dialogue to action-based theories of joint action. We propose that the theory can also incorporate intentional strategies that increase communicative success: for example, signaling strategies that help remaining predictable and forming common ground.
2013
Pezzulo, G., Dindo, H. (2013). Intentional strategies that make co-actors more predictable: The case of signaling. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 36 [10.1017/S0140525X12002816].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/95439
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact