This study uses a systemic approach to explore the dynamics of learning and negative emotion in workplace intraorganisational conflict. Our dynamic hypothesis was that the endogenous dynamics between the level of intraorganisational conflict and the levels of learning and negative emotion, which are accumulating in the organisation as by-products of conflict, are causing the conflict level to oscillate. A review by Cronin & Berzukova (2006) identified two problematic, undesired patterns of intraorganisational conflict development over time (Group Disintegration, Groupthink) and one desired pattern of moderate conflict level (Cohesion and Resilience), which comprised our Reference Mode. A Causal Loop Diagram and a quantified, Stock and Flow model were built using Stella Architect software, to test our hypothesis. Direct and Indirect structure tests as well as behaviour tests and sensitivity analysis were performed in order to validate, calibrate and increase confidence in the model. After calibration, the base run of our model reproduced the reference mode of the 2 undesired behaviour patterns. Our results are in line with the view of Cronin & Berzukova (2006) that as conflict builds up, it causes negative emotion as well as learning to increase through two basic mechanisms: the Conflict-Learning Loop and the Conflict-Negative Feelings Loop.

Lenakaki, A., Kopainsky, Birgit (July 2020).Using System Dynamics to understand Workplace Conflict.

Using System Dynamics to understand Workplace Conflict

Lenakaki A.
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;

Abstract

This study uses a systemic approach to explore the dynamics of learning and negative emotion in workplace intraorganisational conflict. Our dynamic hypothesis was that the endogenous dynamics between the level of intraorganisational conflict and the levels of learning and negative emotion, which are accumulating in the organisation as by-products of conflict, are causing the conflict level to oscillate. A review by Cronin & Berzukova (2006) identified two problematic, undesired patterns of intraorganisational conflict development over time (Group Disintegration, Groupthink) and one desired pattern of moderate conflict level (Cohesion and Resilience), which comprised our Reference Mode. A Causal Loop Diagram and a quantified, Stock and Flow model were built using Stella Architect software, to test our hypothesis. Direct and Indirect structure tests as well as behaviour tests and sensitivity analysis were performed in order to validate, calibrate and increase confidence in the model. After calibration, the base run of our model reproduced the reference mode of the 2 undesired behaviour patterns. Our results are in line with the view of Cronin & Berzukova (2006) that as conflict builds up, it causes negative emotion as well as learning to increase through two basic mechanisms: the Conflict-Learning Loop and the Conflict-Negative Feelings Loop.
System Dynamics, Workplace Conflict
Lenakaki, A., Kopainsky, Birgit (July 2020).Using System Dynamics to understand Workplace Conflict.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CONFLICTS SD.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Extended Abstract & Certificate of attendance
Tipologia: Pre-print
Dimensione 257.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
257.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/500766
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact