INTRODUCTION: Systemic chemotherapy offers poor control over peritoneal disease, maybe as a consequence of restricted drug availability within the abdominal cavity. Locoregional chemotherapy may overcome these shortcomings but its administration is limited to a few patients with confined peritoneal spread. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) emerged in the last years as a novel method of intraperitoneal drug administration. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We report a meta-analysis of published studies on PIPAC safety and pathological anti-tumoral efficacy on PC from various tumor entities, with the aim of providing more evidence to support further research. This systematic review and meta-analysis were designed, conducted and reported according to the PRISMA statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: An overall pathological response rate of 43.7% was calculated on a total of 668 patients who underwent 1480 PIPAC cycles across the 20 studies. Pooled severe adverse events rate (CTCAE grade 3-4) was 10% and seven deaths across all studies were reported, of which only four were related to PIPAC. CONCLUSIONS: PIPAC is a safe procedure which has a relevant anti-tumoral activity on peritoneal carcinomatosis. Further studies, even in the early stage of disease, are awaited to assess the clinical benefit of PIPAC. This review may serve as a reliable basis for future research.

Di Giorgio A., Abatini C., Attalla El Halabieh M., Vita E., Vizzielli G., Gallotta V., et al. (2019). From palliation to cure: PIPAC for peritoneal malignancies. MINERVA MEDICA, 110(4), 385-398 [10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06081-6].

From palliation to cure: PIPAC for peritoneal malignancies

Rotolo S.
2019-01-01

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Systemic chemotherapy offers poor control over peritoneal disease, maybe as a consequence of restricted drug availability within the abdominal cavity. Locoregional chemotherapy may overcome these shortcomings but its administration is limited to a few patients with confined peritoneal spread. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) emerged in the last years as a novel method of intraperitoneal drug administration. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We report a meta-analysis of published studies on PIPAC safety and pathological anti-tumoral efficacy on PC from various tumor entities, with the aim of providing more evidence to support further research. This systematic review and meta-analysis were designed, conducted and reported according to the PRISMA statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: An overall pathological response rate of 43.7% was calculated on a total of 668 patients who underwent 1480 PIPAC cycles across the 20 studies. Pooled severe adverse events rate (CTCAE grade 3-4) was 10% and seven deaths across all studies were reported, of which only four were related to PIPAC. CONCLUSIONS: PIPAC is a safe procedure which has a relevant anti-tumoral activity on peritoneal carcinomatosis. Further studies, even in the early stage of disease, are awaited to assess the clinical benefit of PIPAC. This review may serve as a reliable basis for future research.
2019
Di Giorgio A., Abatini C., Attalla El Halabieh M., Vita E., Vizzielli G., Gallotta V., et al. (2019). From palliation to cure: PIPAC for peritoneal malignancies. MINERVA MEDICA, 110(4), 385-398 [10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06081-6].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Review PIPAC.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.02 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/488603
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact