Background: Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, caused by deficient activity of the alpha-galactosidase A enzyme leading to progressive and multisystemic accumulation of globotriaosylceramide. Recent data point toward oxidative stress signalling which could play an important role in both pathophysiology and disease progression. Methods: We have examined oxidative stress biomarkers [Advanced Oxidation Protein Products (AOPP), Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP), thiolic groups] in blood samples from 60 patients and 77 healthy controls. Results: AOPP levels were higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.00001) and patients presented decreased levels of antioxidant defences (FRAP and thiols) with respect to controls (p < 0.00001). In a small group of eight treatment-naïve subjects with FD-related mutations, we found altered levels of oxidative stress parameters and incipient signs of organ damage despite normal lyso-Gb3 levels. Conclusions: Oxidative stress occurs in FD in both treated and naïve patients, highlighting the need of further research in oxidative stress-targeted therapies. Furthermore, we found that oxidative stress biomarkers may represent early markers of disease in treatment-naïve patients with a potential role in helping interpretation of FD-related mutations and time to treatment decision.

Simoncini C., Torri S., Montano V., Chico L., Gruosso F., Tuttolomondo A., et al. (2020). Oxidative stress biomarkers in Fabry disease: is there a room for them?. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 267(12), 3741-3752 [10.1007/s00415-020-10044-w].

Oxidative stress biomarkers in Fabry disease: is there a room for them?

Tuttolomondo A.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Simonetta I.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, caused by deficient activity of the alpha-galactosidase A enzyme leading to progressive and multisystemic accumulation of globotriaosylceramide. Recent data point toward oxidative stress signalling which could play an important role in both pathophysiology and disease progression. Methods: We have examined oxidative stress biomarkers [Advanced Oxidation Protein Products (AOPP), Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP), thiolic groups] in blood samples from 60 patients and 77 healthy controls. Results: AOPP levels were higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.00001) and patients presented decreased levels of antioxidant defences (FRAP and thiols) with respect to controls (p < 0.00001). In a small group of eight treatment-naïve subjects with FD-related mutations, we found altered levels of oxidative stress parameters and incipient signs of organ damage despite normal lyso-Gb3 levels. Conclusions: Oxidative stress occurs in FD in both treated and naïve patients, highlighting the need of further research in oxidative stress-targeted therapies. Furthermore, we found that oxidative stress biomarkers may represent early markers of disease in treatment-naïve patients with a potential role in helping interpretation of FD-related mutations and time to treatment decision.
2020
Simoncini C., Torri S., Montano V., Chico L., Gruosso F., Tuttolomondo A., et al. (2020). Oxidative stress biomarkers in Fabry disease: is there a room for them?. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 267(12), 3741-3752 [10.1007/s00415-020-10044-w].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Journal of Neurology 2020 Fabry oxidative stress Michelangelo Mancuso (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print
Dimensione 886.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
886.64 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Simoncini2020_Article_OxidativeStressBiomarkersInFab.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 870.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
870.64 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/483356
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact