The combination of Lewis acids and Lewis bases, currently defined as catalysts and co-catalysts (or promoter) respectively, in the reaction between epoxides and CO2 to give cyclic carbonates, is discussed, starting from examples in which the Lewis base was used in larger amount with respect to the Lewis acid. In these cases, turnover frequency (TOF) values have been usually calculated taking into account solely the amount of the Lewis acid employed. The occurrence of two distinct reaction pathways, one catalysed by the sole Lewis base and the other one catalysed by the Lewis acid/Lewis base couple, in which the Lewis acid alone does not play a catalytic role, should bring researchers to reconsider the TOF calculation based solely on the amount of Lewis acid, especially when the amount of the Lewis base used is much larger than the Lewis acid. In order to draw a more precise picture of how the use of a Lewis base/Lewis acid co-catalytic system affects the reaction course, we analytically examined a general mechanistic scheme able to model the overall process. For these cases, we propose a simple equation for a better estimation of TOF values and a normalization approach for a more consistent comparison between various catalytic systems.

Campisciano, V., Calabrese, C., Giacalone, F., Aprile, C., Lo Meo, P., Gruttadauria, M. (2020). Reconsidering TOF calculation in the transformation of epoxides and CO2 into cyclic carbonates. JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 38, 132-140 [10.1016/j.jcou.2020.01.015].

Reconsidering TOF calculation in the transformation of epoxides and CO2 into cyclic carbonates

Campisciano, Vincenzo;Calabrese, Carla;Giacalone, Francesco;Lo Meo, Paolo
;
Gruttadauria, Michelangelo
2020-01-01

Abstract

The combination of Lewis acids and Lewis bases, currently defined as catalysts and co-catalysts (or promoter) respectively, in the reaction between epoxides and CO2 to give cyclic carbonates, is discussed, starting from examples in which the Lewis base was used in larger amount with respect to the Lewis acid. In these cases, turnover frequency (TOF) values have been usually calculated taking into account solely the amount of the Lewis acid employed. The occurrence of two distinct reaction pathways, one catalysed by the sole Lewis base and the other one catalysed by the Lewis acid/Lewis base couple, in which the Lewis acid alone does not play a catalytic role, should bring researchers to reconsider the TOF calculation based solely on the amount of Lewis acid, especially when the amount of the Lewis base used is much larger than the Lewis acid. In order to draw a more precise picture of how the use of a Lewis base/Lewis acid co-catalytic system affects the reaction course, we analytically examined a general mechanistic scheme able to model the overall process. For these cases, we propose a simple equation for a better estimation of TOF values and a normalization approach for a more consistent comparison between various catalytic systems.
2020
Campisciano, V., Calabrese, C., Giacalone, F., Aprile, C., Lo Meo, P., Gruttadauria, M. (2020). Reconsidering TOF calculation in the transformation of epoxides and CO2 into cyclic carbonates. JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 38, 132-140 [10.1016/j.jcou.2020.01.015].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pagination_JCOU_1121.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 678.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
678.1 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
1-s2.0-S2212982019308029-main.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.86 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Paper CO2 RE-REVISED_2 (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print
Dimensione 1.33 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.33 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/424702
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact