Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord injury in the elderly population in the developed world, and it significantly impacts on quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Surgical treatment remains the treatment option able to halt the disease progression and provide neurological recovery in most of the patients. While it remains challenging to predict exactly who will improve after surgery, increasingly it has been shown that clinical, imaging and electrophysiological factors can predict, with relatively good capacity, those who are more likely to benefit. Clinically, baseline neurological impairment appears to be strongly related with outcome, and MRI, with T1-hypointensity and the length of T2-hyperintensity, appears to be most prognostic. In this context, electrophysiology (both motor and sensory evoked potentials, MEPs and SEPs) have shown some predictive capacity, but large studies are lacking. While multivariate models have been conducted using clinical and MRI data, there remains no multimodal prediction models which encompass the predictive capacity from clinical, imaging and electrophysiological data. In the present review, the rationale for clinical, imaging and electrophysiological utilization in clinical practice are examined, and a model of multimodal assessment for the management of DCM is discussed.

Jannelli, G., Nouri, A., Molliqaj, G., Grasso, G., Tessitore, E. (2020). DEGENERATIVE CERVICAL MYELOPATHY: REVIEW OF SURGICAL OUTCOME PREDICTORS AND NEED FOR MULTIMODAL APPROACH. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 140, 541-547 [10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.233].

DEGENERATIVE CERVICAL MYELOPATHY: REVIEW OF SURGICAL OUTCOME PREDICTORS AND NEED FOR MULTIMODAL APPROACH

Grasso, Giovanni;
2020-08-01

Abstract

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord injury in the elderly population in the developed world, and it significantly impacts on quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Surgical treatment remains the treatment option able to halt the disease progression and provide neurological recovery in most of the patients. While it remains challenging to predict exactly who will improve after surgery, increasingly it has been shown that clinical, imaging and electrophysiological factors can predict, with relatively good capacity, those who are more likely to benefit. Clinically, baseline neurological impairment appears to be strongly related with outcome, and MRI, with T1-hypointensity and the length of T2-hyperintensity, appears to be most prognostic. In this context, electrophysiology (both motor and sensory evoked potentials, MEPs and SEPs) have shown some predictive capacity, but large studies are lacking. While multivariate models have been conducted using clinical and MRI data, there remains no multimodal prediction models which encompass the predictive capacity from clinical, imaging and electrophysiological data. In the present review, the rationale for clinical, imaging and electrophysiological utilization in clinical practice are examined, and a model of multimodal assessment for the management of DCM is discussed.
ago-2020
Jannelli, G., Nouri, A., Molliqaj, G., Grasso, G., Tessitore, E. (2020). DEGENERATIVE CERVICAL MYELOPATHY: REVIEW OF SURGICAL OUTCOME PREDICTORS AND NEED FOR MULTIMODAL APPROACH. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 140, 541-547 [10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.233].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1878875020309438-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print
Dimensione 1.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.78 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S1878875020309438-main.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 758.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
758.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/414886
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact