Because of the great heterogeneity of subjects and styles, esthetic perception delineates a special and elusive field of research in vision, which represents an interesting challenge for cognitive science tools. With specific regard to the role of visual complexity, in this paper we present an experiment aimed to measure this dimension in a heterogeneous set of paintings. We compared perceived time complexity measures — based on a temporal estimation paradigm — with physical and statistical properties of the paintings, obtaining a strong correlation between psychological and computational results.

Cardaci, M., Di Gesu, V., Petrou, M., Tabacchi, M. (2009). Attentional vs computational complexity measures in observing paintings. SPATIAL VISION, 22(3), 195-209 [doi:10.1163/156856809788313138].

Attentional vs computational complexity measures in observing paintings

CARDACI, Maurizio;DI GESU', Vito;TABACCHI, Marco
2009-01-01

Abstract

Because of the great heterogeneity of subjects and styles, esthetic perception delineates a special and elusive field of research in vision, which represents an interesting challenge for cognitive science tools. With specific regard to the role of visual complexity, in this paper we present an experiment aimed to measure this dimension in a heterogeneous set of paintings. We compared perceived time complexity measures — based on a temporal estimation paradigm — with physical and statistical properties of the paintings, obtaining a strong correlation between psychological and computational results.
2009
Settore INF/01 - Informatica
Cardaci, M., Di Gesu, V., Petrou, M., Tabacchi, M. (2009). Attentional vs computational complexity measures in observing paintings. SPATIAL VISION, 22(3), 195-209 [doi:10.1163/156856809788313138].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/40548
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact