Purpose. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical proprieties of 4 and 5-strand- grafts. Methods. For the present study, fresh-frozen bovine common digital extensor tendons were used. Tendon grafts were prepared and sized to have a length of almost 27 cm and a cylinder 4 strand diameter of 8 mm. In half of all samples (Group A, n=12,), the graft was formed by 2 bundles duplicated around a metallic rod creating a 4-strand-tendon construct. In the other half of samples (Group B, n= 12,) 5-strand-tendon construct was created duplicating a single tendon around the rod, and tripling the other one. The grafts were preconditioned at 50 N for 10 min, followed by 1,000 cyclic loading between 50 and 250 N. Load-to-failure test was then carried out at a rate of 1 mm/s. Results. No statistically significant differences were found between two groups concern- ing cyclic elongation at the 500th cycle and at the final cycle. An increased stiffness was observed in the Group B during cyclic loads and at pull-out (p<0.05). Significant differ- ences were noted at the ultimate load-to-failure between Group A (1533 ± 454 N) and Group B (1139 ± 276 N) (p< 0.05). Conclusion. This study showed that both graft construct appears to be biomechanical- ly effective in a bovine tendon model. 5-strand-graft showed an increased stiffness and a decreased ultimate load-to-failure comparing to the 4-strand-graft construct. Biomechan- ically, no real benefit could be observed in the clinical setting increasing the numbers of strands used for the ACL reconstructive surgery.

davide pavan, G.P. (2019). Does the 5-strand-graft have superior biomechanical behaviour than 4-strand-graft during acl reconstruction?. M.L.T.J. MUSCLES, LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 9(3), 379-385 [10.32098/mltj.03.2019.12].

Does the 5-strand-graft have superior biomechanical behaviour than 4-strand-graft during acl reconstruction?

davide pavan
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Giuseppe Pitarresi
Investigation
;
Federica Morello
Investigation
;
francesco Monachino
Investigation
;
Antonino Sanfilippo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Antonio D’Arienzo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Lawrence Camarda
Membro del Collaboration Group
2019-01-01

Abstract

Purpose. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical proprieties of 4 and 5-strand- grafts. Methods. For the present study, fresh-frozen bovine common digital extensor tendons were used. Tendon grafts were prepared and sized to have a length of almost 27 cm and a cylinder 4 strand diameter of 8 mm. In half of all samples (Group A, n=12,), the graft was formed by 2 bundles duplicated around a metallic rod creating a 4-strand-tendon construct. In the other half of samples (Group B, n= 12,) 5-strand-tendon construct was created duplicating a single tendon around the rod, and tripling the other one. The grafts were preconditioned at 50 N for 10 min, followed by 1,000 cyclic loading between 50 and 250 N. Load-to-failure test was then carried out at a rate of 1 mm/s. Results. No statistically significant differences were found between two groups concern- ing cyclic elongation at the 500th cycle and at the final cycle. An increased stiffness was observed in the Group B during cyclic loads and at pull-out (p<0.05). Significant differ- ences were noted at the ultimate load-to-failure between Group A (1533 ± 454 N) and Group B (1139 ± 276 N) (p< 0.05). Conclusion. This study showed that both graft construct appears to be biomechanical- ly effective in a bovine tendon model. 5-strand-graft showed an increased stiffness and a decreased ultimate load-to-failure comparing to the 4-strand-graft construct. Biomechan- ically, no real benefit could be observed in the clinical setting increasing the numbers of strands used for the ACL reconstructive surgery.
2019
Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore
Settore ING-IND/14 - Progettazione Meccanica E Costruzione Di Macchine
davide pavan, G.P. (2019). Does the 5-strand-graft have superior biomechanical behaviour than 4-strand-graft during acl reconstruction?. M.L.T.J. MUSCLES, LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 9(3), 379-385 [10.32098/mltj.03.2019.12].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Camarda.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: manuscript
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 877.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
877.68 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/378890
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact