The purpose of this experimental study is to assess the impact of different concentrations of chromium (Cr) through time on the diversity of cultured benthic foraminifera combining two morphological approaches for the identification of living specimens that are Rose Bengal (RB) staining and CellTracker Green (CTG) labelling as well as environmental DNA and RNA metabarcoding. Seven tanks/aquaria with different concentrations of Cr in water, namely 100 ppt, 1 ppb, 10 ppb, 100 ppb, 1 ppm and 10 ppm plus the control were used. A mesocosm was extracted from each tank at pre-established time (1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks 6 weeks and 8 weeks). Morphological analyses produced 6 datasets based on staining techniques (RB vs. CTG) and the considered sediments’ fractions (>125 μm, 63-125 μm and >63 μm) and several foraminiferal parameters (i.e., S, H’ and Fisher α index). On the basis of the correlation analyses, no significant correlations among diversity indexes calculated for RB and Cr concentrations in water and sediment were found. On the contrary, significant negative correlation values were observed betweendiversity indexes from the CTG datasets and Cr concentrations in sediment. Molecular analyses produced 6 datasets (Filter 1, 10 and 100 for both eDNA and eRNA). In all datasets generated from the eRNA but not with eDNA analyses, the diversity decreased with increasing Cr concentrations. Environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding show evidence that Cr pollution has detrimental effects on benthic foraminifera. Compared to morphological approach, the metabarcoding offers several advantages, such as wider range of analyzed foraminiferal taxa among which some may be potential key indicators of Cr pollution. This study further supports foraminiferal metabarcoding as a complementary and/or alternative method to standard biomonitoring program based on the morphological identification of species communities.

Fabrizio Frontalini, Mattia Greco, Letizia Di Bella, Franck Lejzerowicz, Emanuela Reo, Tristan Cordier, Antonio Caruso, Claudia Cosentino, Antonella Maccotta, Giovanna Scopelliti, Virginia Martins, Maria Teresa Losada, Eric Armynot du Châtelet, Rodolfo Coccioni, and Jan Pawlowski (17-22 giugno 2018).Assessing the effect of chromium pollution on benthic foraminiferal community: morphological vs. environmental metabarcoding approaches.

Assessing the effect of chromium pollution on benthic foraminiferal community: morphological vs. environmental metabarcoding approaches

Antonio Caruso;Claudia Cosentino;Antonella Maccotta;Giovanna Scopelliti;

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study is to assess the impact of different concentrations of chromium (Cr) through time on the diversity of cultured benthic foraminifera combining two morphological approaches for the identification of living specimens that are Rose Bengal (RB) staining and CellTracker Green (CTG) labelling as well as environmental DNA and RNA metabarcoding. Seven tanks/aquaria with different concentrations of Cr in water, namely 100 ppt, 1 ppb, 10 ppb, 100 ppb, 1 ppm and 10 ppm plus the control were used. A mesocosm was extracted from each tank at pre-established time (1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks 6 weeks and 8 weeks). Morphological analyses produced 6 datasets based on staining techniques (RB vs. CTG) and the considered sediments’ fractions (>125 μm, 63-125 μm and >63 μm) and several foraminiferal parameters (i.e., S, H’ and Fisher α index). On the basis of the correlation analyses, no significant correlations among diversity indexes calculated for RB and Cr concentrations in water and sediment were found. On the contrary, significant negative correlation values were observed betweendiversity indexes from the CTG datasets and Cr concentrations in sediment. Molecular analyses produced 6 datasets (Filter 1, 10 and 100 for both eDNA and eRNA). In all datasets generated from the eRNA but not with eDNA analyses, the diversity decreased with increasing Cr concentrations. Environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding show evidence that Cr pollution has detrimental effects on benthic foraminifera. Compared to morphological approach, the metabarcoding offers several advantages, such as wider range of analyzed foraminiferal taxa among which some may be potential key indicators of Cr pollution. This study further supports foraminiferal metabarcoding as a complementary and/or alternative method to standard biomonitoring program based on the morphological identification of species communities.
chromium pollution, benthic foraminifera, metabarcoding approaches
Fabrizio Frontalini, Mattia Greco, Letizia Di Bella, Franck Lejzerowicz, Emanuela Reo, Tristan Cordier, Antonio Caruso, Claudia Cosentino, Antonella Maccotta, Giovanna Scopelliti, Virginia Martins, Maria Teresa Losada, Eric Armynot du Châtelet, Rodolfo Coccioni, and Jan Pawlowski (17-22 giugno 2018).Assessing the effect of chromium pollution on benthic foraminiferal community: morphological vs. environmental metabarcoding approaches.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ACFrOgDmY3cceJ4DAxsx4187uQFgoG1VmE-G85uA3NE0hD_mRh7kQkBkfoD6ZCcR21k2jntJ-BNNOwp_7aeM1aEO0EoQUDKOimluc6opww2ShHKwb4prZXrMCmbFMzU=.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 223.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
223.05 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/358435
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact