This paper compares two mathematical models (Model I and Model II) to predict greenhouse gases emission from a University Cape Town (UCT) – membrane bioreactor (MBR) plant. Model I considers N2O production only during denitrification. Model II takes into account the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) formation pathways for N2O. Both models were calibrated adopting real data. Model comparison was performed in terms of (i) sensitivity analysis (ii) best fit and (iii) model prediction uncertainty. On average 6% of factors of Model I and 9% of Model II resulted to be important. In terms of best fit, Model II had a better capability of reproducing the measured data. The average efficiency related to the N2O model outputs was equal to 0.33 and 0.38 for Model I and Model II, respectively. On average, 73% (Model I) and 86% (Model II) of measured data lay inside the uncertainty bands.

Mannina, G., Cosenza, A., Ekama, G. (2018). Mathematical modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from membrane bioreactors: A comprehensive comparison of two mathematical models. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 268, 107-115 [10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.106].

Mathematical modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from membrane bioreactors: A comprehensive comparison of two mathematical models

Mannina, Giorgio
;
Cosenza, Alida;
2018-01-01

Abstract

This paper compares two mathematical models (Model I and Model II) to predict greenhouse gases emission from a University Cape Town (UCT) – membrane bioreactor (MBR) plant. Model I considers N2O production only during denitrification. Model II takes into account the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) formation pathways for N2O. Both models were calibrated adopting real data. Model comparison was performed in terms of (i) sensitivity analysis (ii) best fit and (iii) model prediction uncertainty. On average 6% of factors of Model I and 9% of Model II resulted to be important. In terms of best fit, Model II had a better capability of reproducing the measured data. The average efficiency related to the N2O model outputs was equal to 0.33 and 0.38 for Model I and Model II, respectively. On average, 73% (Model I) and 86% (Model II) of measured data lay inside the uncertainty bands.
2018
Settore ICAR/03 - Ingegneria Sanitaria-Ambientale
Mannina, G., Cosenza, A., Ekama, G. (2018). Mathematical modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from membrane bioreactors: A comprehensive comparison of two mathematical models. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 268, 107-115 [10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.106].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0960852418310356-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 1.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.67 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/325915
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact