Viollet-le-Duc’s journey in Italy is marked not only by the maturation of his critical principles – that lead him to abandon his studies on ancient times and the Renaissance in favour of a problematic reflection on the Middle Ages – but also by the encounter with important interlocutors, who were crucial for his education. Among these, Domenico Lo Faso Pietrasanta, Duke of Serradifalco, whom he met in Sicily, probably represents the intellectual voice closest to Viollet’s revision process of architecture. The duke was transforming the approach to the study of local culture, definitively overcoming the tendency to encyclopaedism, adopting philological criteria and methodologies of research which were very close to the positivist historiography approach. When Viollet arrived in Palermo, Serradifalco was developing a process of revision of medieval Sicilian architecture, with the purpose of finding a “new architecture” for the future. Viollet-le-Duc became involved in this process. The essay underlines the similarities between the experience of Serradifalco and the contemporary activity of Viollet-le-Duc after his stay in Sicily. Apart from differences due to their cultural and political background, they both identified the basis to create a new architectural language in medieval architecture.

Abstract: Viollet-le-Duc nel marzo del 1836 è quasi all’inizio del suo lungo viaggio in Italia. Stupisce di questo viaggio tanto il maturare della svolta critica che lo porta ad una riflessione problematica su temi dell’arte e dell’architettura del Medioevo, sia la determinazione o la lucidità nel rintracciare interlocutori significativi per il suo processo di apprendimento. Fra questi contatti quello con Domenico Lo Faso Pietrasanta è forse il più indiziario di una lucida sindrome di revisione critica della cultura architettonica alla quale si è formato; una volontà che, forse, sta alla base dell’intera organizzazione del viaggio di Viollet-le-Duc.

Sessa, E. (2017). Domenico Lo Faso Pietrasanta duca di Serradifalco ed Eugéne Viollet-le-Duc: apprendistato medievalista e iniziazione all’Arte Regia. ARCHISTOR, 1, 220-249 [10.14633/AHR048].

Domenico Lo Faso Pietrasanta duca di Serradifalco ed Eugéne Viollet-le-Duc: apprendistato medievalista e iniziazione all’Arte Regia

Sessa, Ettore
2017-01-01

Abstract

Viollet-le-Duc’s journey in Italy is marked not only by the maturation of his critical principles – that lead him to abandon his studies on ancient times and the Renaissance in favour of a problematic reflection on the Middle Ages – but also by the encounter with important interlocutors, who were crucial for his education. Among these, Domenico Lo Faso Pietrasanta, Duke of Serradifalco, whom he met in Sicily, probably represents the intellectual voice closest to Viollet’s revision process of architecture. The duke was transforming the approach to the study of local culture, definitively overcoming the tendency to encyclopaedism, adopting philological criteria and methodologies of research which were very close to the positivist historiography approach. When Viollet arrived in Palermo, Serradifalco was developing a process of revision of medieval Sicilian architecture, with the purpose of finding a “new architecture” for the future. Viollet-le-Duc became involved in this process. The essay underlines the similarities between the experience of Serradifalco and the contemporary activity of Viollet-le-Duc after his stay in Sicily. Apart from differences due to their cultural and political background, they both identified the basis to create a new architectural language in medieval architecture.
2017
Settore ICAR/18 - Storia Dell'Architettura
Sessa, E. (2017). Domenico Lo Faso Pietrasanta duca di Serradifalco ed Eugéne Viollet-le-Duc: apprendistato medievalista e iniziazione all’Arte Regia. ARCHISTOR, 1, 220-249 [10.14633/AHR048].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VOLUME VIOLLET LE DUC saggio ES.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Dimensione 3.17 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.17 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/264061
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact