This original form of this rebuttal was submitted to Science on 3 March 2017 (limited to 300 words as per Science editorial policy) but rejected on 13 March 2017. Herein, we elaborate on our original Science submission in order to more fully address the issue without the length limitations. This rebuttal is followed by the list of the signatories who supported our original submission.

Rogers, D., Ahyong, S., Boyko, C., D'Acoz, C., Asakura, A., An, J., et al. (2017). Images are not and should not ever be type specimens: a rebuttal to Garraffoni & Freitas. ZOOTAXA, 4269(4), 455-459 [10.11646/zootaxa.4269.4.3].

Images are not and should not ever be type specimens: a rebuttal to Garraffoni & Freitas

MARRONE, Federico;
2017-01-01

Abstract

This original form of this rebuttal was submitted to Science on 3 March 2017 (limited to 300 words as per Science editorial policy) but rejected on 13 March 2017. Herein, we elaborate on our original Science submission in order to more fully address the issue without the length limitations. This rebuttal is followed by the list of the signatories who supported our original submission.
2017
Settore BIO/05 - Zoologia
Rogers, D., Ahyong, S., Boyko, C., D'Acoz, C., Asakura, A., An, J., et al. (2017). Images are not and should not ever be type specimens: a rebuttal to Garraffoni & Freitas. ZOOTAXA, 4269(4), 455-459 [10.11646/zootaxa.4269.4.3].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2017_Rogers et al.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Dimensione 134.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
134.98 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/232323
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact