Abstract This paper focuses on inferential tools in the logistic regression model fitted by the Firth penalized likelihood. In this context, the Likelihood Ratio statistic is often reported to be the preferred choice as compared to the ‘traditional’ Wald statistic. In this work, we consider and discuss a wider range of test statistics, including the robust Wald, the Score, and the recently proposed Gradient statistic. We compare all these asymptotically equivalent statistics in terms of interval estimation and hypothesis testing via simulation experiments and analyses of two real datasets. We find out that the Likelihood ratio statistic does not appear the best inferential device in the Firth penalized logistic regression

Siino, M., Fasola, S., Muggeo, V. (2018). Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 27(5), 1365-1375 [10.1177/0962280216661213].

Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study

Siino, Marianna;FASOLA, Salvatore;MUGGEO, Vito Michele Rosario
2018-01-01

Abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on inferential tools in the logistic regression model fitted by the Firth penalized likelihood. In this context, the Likelihood Ratio statistic is often reported to be the preferred choice as compared to the ‘traditional’ Wald statistic. In this work, we consider and discuss a wider range of test statistics, including the robust Wald, the Score, and the recently proposed Gradient statistic. We compare all these asymptotically equivalent statistics in terms of interval estimation and hypothesis testing via simulation experiments and analyses of two real datasets. We find out that the Likelihood ratio statistic does not appear the best inferential device in the Firth penalized logistic regression
2018
Settore SECS-S/01 - Statistica
Siino, M., Fasola, S., Muggeo, V. (2018). Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 27(5), 1365-1375 [10.1177/0962280216661213].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Muggeo_Inferential.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print
Dimensione 202.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
202.34 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
0962280216661213.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 188.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
188.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/181280
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact