In this paper, a dynamic simulation of a building located in the Campus University of Palermo, Italy, has been carried out. We considered two different scenarios; in the first one, the building as it is, with a conventional covering, while in the second one the roof was equipped with a green roof. The results of the two simulations have been compared, suggesting that such building component could contribute to the energy savings of the building. However, it has to be considered as part of other possible actions devoted to improve the energy efficiency of the whole building. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the CENTRO CONGRESSI INTERNAZIONALE SRL

In this paper, a dynamic simulation of a building located in the Campus University of Palermo, Italy, has been carried out. We considered two different scenarios; in the first one, the building as it is, with a conventional covering, while in the second one the roof was equipped with a green roof. The results of the two simulations have been compared, suggesting that such building component could contribute to the energy savings of the building. However, it has to be considered as part of other possible actions devoted to improve the energy efficiency of the whole building.

Ferrante, P., LA GENNUSA, M., Peri, G., Scaccianoce, G., Sorrentino, G. (2015). Comparison between conventional and vegetated roof by means of a dynamic simulation. ENERGY PROCEDIA, 78, 2917-2922 [10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.667].

Comparison between conventional and vegetated roof by means of a dynamic simulation

FERRANTE, Patrizia;LA GENNUSA, Maria;PERI, Giorgia;SCACCIANOCE, Gianluca;SORRENTINO, Giancarlo
2015-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, a dynamic simulation of a building located in the Campus University of Palermo, Italy, has been carried out. We considered two different scenarios; in the first one, the building as it is, with a conventional covering, while in the second one the roof was equipped with a green roof. The results of the two simulations have been compared, suggesting that such building component could contribute to the energy savings of the building. However, it has to be considered as part of other possible actions devoted to improve the energy efficiency of the whole building.
2015
Settore ING-IND/11 - Fisica Tecnica Ambientale
Ferrante, P., LA GENNUSA, M., Peri, G., Scaccianoce, G., Sorrentino, G. (2015). Comparison between conventional and vegetated roof by means of a dynamic simulation. ENERGY PROCEDIA, 78, 2917-2922 [10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.667].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Comparison between conventional and vegetated roof by means of a dynamic simulation.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 303.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
303.79 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/166340
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact