Between science and economic development, and in the name of democratic control over themanagement of public resources, governments have progressively gained a role in mechanisms of knowledge production. In severalcountries, the United Kingdom, Australia, and France being the most well known cases, this has resulted in various evaluationexercises. All have generated wide debate within the scientific community on the most appropriate methods and criteria to be used

Monteleone, C., Panebianco, S., Zucchini, F. (2013). Evaluating the Evaluation. The pros and cons of ‘VQR’ in social and political research. ITALIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 8.

Evaluating the Evaluation. The pros and cons of ‘VQR’ in social and political research

MONTELEONE, Carla;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Between science and economic development, and in the name of democratic control over themanagement of public resources, governments have progressively gained a role in mechanisms of knowledge production. In severalcountries, the United Kingdom, Australia, and France being the most well known cases, this has resulted in various evaluationexercises. All have generated wide debate within the scientific community on the most appropriate methods and criteria to be used
2013
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
Monteleone, C., Panebianco, S., Zucchini, F. (2013). Evaluating the Evaluation. The pros and cons of ‘VQR’ in social and political research. ITALIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 8.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Evaluating the Evaluation.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 5.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.93 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/101383
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact